To which Finkelhor might reply "to 'move forward' for one group is to move backward for the group whose resources have been reduced" and when there is no real evidence, as yet, that the first group, or elements of it (those responding negatively to being given the ACEsQ?), have in fact benefitted, how can that be "social justice"?
No easy answers, especially for people involved in trying to bring about changes in the health care system, like Colette