whoever that person will be, whatever their "qualifications", will need to be both "acceptable" and still a "contrarian"; someone sympathetic to, yet not a "sympathetiser within" so-called "ACEs Science" -- a term not accepted by many who have contributed, for decades, to improving the well-being of those who have weathered the storms of "childhood adversity" -- another valid point of Finkelhor's. Plus a whole host of other personal and skills-based qualities. "Not impossible at all!!" Let's hope not, but still a lot to ask for. Outlining the right "selection criteria" for the person to ask "the right questions" is yet to begin. Finkelhor has made an invaluable start, imho, by asking some essential, however uncomfortable, questions.