Hi all-It was great to be a part of the recent 'Beyond Paper Tigers' conference in WA!

Many speakers from the stage and around the tables, referenced the fact that groups who have initially not incorporated ACEs science into Trauma-informed/Trauma-focused programs/trainings etc have seen the results of that and have had to go back and address some of these issues and include ACEs in their programs after the fact.  I understand many of the reasons this is the case, and wholeheartedly agree, but have struggled to find good articles or information on this to help use as evidence when addressing this with people who currently AREN'T incorporating ACEs science into their TI programs.  I would appreciate any personal thoughts or experience or reference to places I might find more about this that I could use to help educate/bring change and improve my own understanding.

(Please forgive me if this is addressed elsewhere, but I've spent some time looking and couldn't find it if so?)

Original Post

Add Reply

Likes (1)
Daun Kauffman
Post
×
×
×
×